www.16personalities.com
Obviously its not the genuine MB test, but the same sort of thing dressed up in a different way. Spits out the same answer as the two formal ones I've done for job applications so probably fairly accurate to the real thing*.
Oh, and INTJ if anyone's interested.
* which is, I suspect, pretty much utter tosh. But mildly entertaining none the less.
|
We've done this before. I'm pretty sceptical of value too. I'm ISTP on this one and always similar on others.
Spent half a week at the Civil Service College c2006 exploring use of Myers Briggs to develop my skills as a Manager. Waste of £2k of taxpayers money.
Others here including those like NoFM who have real management experience though see value in it.
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Wed 23 Dec 15 at 20:24
|
ISFJ-A which it says is 'defender'.
Ive taken these types of tests before ( mind you who hasn't) can't remember what I got last time.
|
Trouble is with all these tests its all too easy to slip into a persona and get any result you desire out the other end.
|
....indeed. I'm sure whenever I did one it should have come up as DBFR (Devious B*st*rd Fiddled Results), but I always seemed to get away with it.
|
They got round that on the ones I did by having a strict time limit on each question (something like 10 seconds) so you had to react fairly instinctively, and about 300 questions. Though I suppose you could method-act your way through the whole lot.
|
...the last (Myers Briggs) one I did was an on-line one much like that, along with two other variations, and an hours telephone evaluation by a "duty psychiatrist". I did the latter sat in a car overlooking beautiful Peak District scenery - went well from my end, but god knows what it felt like from the other.
It was for a Senior Civil Service job (no, I have never before or since worked in the CS), and I must have done something right, as I was shortlisted (1 of 2) and interviewed by a Civil Service Commissioner, the head of department, and a number of flunkeys, all of whom I got on with swimmingly, except the head of department, who I disliked intensely (and the feeling was mutual I suspect).
Anyway, though I was ideally suited to the appointment, the other guy got it (and he did, literally, live round the corner). It was one of those occasions on which I was both annoyed I didn't get the job, and delighted at the same time.
In retrospect, (knowing some of the immediate aftermath) I was even more delighted I hadn't got it.
Still think I "tricked" the MB assessment, though ;-)
|
I got
MEDIATOR (INFP-T)
Whatever that might really mean.
|
The trouble with MB is that everyone gets a nice sounding personality which is not most persons experience of the people they know and work with. Where are work shy skiver, moaner, aggressive bully, stirrer, creep et al who inhabit every office I have worked in?
Last edited by: CGNorwich on Wed 23 Dec 15 at 21:59
|
>> Where are work shy
>> skiver, moaner, aggressive bully, stirrer, creep et al
I retired
|
>> I retired
....really...?
;-)
|
LOGISTICIAN (ISTJ-A) - I did this a few years ago on an away day event, but cant actually remember what I got last time.
|
A previous employer invested a lost in getting staff above a certain grade tested.
I forget what I came out as but I was classed as a technical specialist.
Certain types that fitted the "outgoing" personality traits got promoted to the senior management and the board. They were ALL sales people and the company went from a decent turnover and healthy profit to very high turnover and losses.
Things were changed back to the previous model quite quickly after that.
|
As I recall Duncan Banatyne saying "turnovers vanity, profit is sanity"
|
Can't believe I had the patience, but I answered all 100 questions, usually with a neutral or minimally emphatic leaning one way or the other.
When I asked what it thought, it gave me a four-letter personality type and a rather flattering, all-purpose assessment under a lot of headings. Reading it I couldn't help feeling caressed, if a bit ashamed.
Reminds me of the psychometric crap some of my colleagues in market research used to come up with. It needn't have been valueless, put it usually was in practice.
|
Role is Explorer.
I don'y really see the point fiddling the trest if it's just a bit of fun, kike this one.
When I had to do some for work I thought I understood they could tell from patterns in your answers whether you were being consistent (and therefore honest)
|
It's not that straightforward smokie, believe me. You can make an assessment after talking to someone at length and still be wrong.
As for seven-point positive to negative psychometric questions, they won't give you the truth either. They'll tell you something but not much.
All good fun though.
|
>>
>> When I had to do some for work I thought I understood they could tell
>> from patterns in your answers whether you were being consistent (and therefore honest)
>>
I understood that from certain patterns in your answers they could tell whether you were being deliberately consistent (and therefore dishonest).
|
ENTJ
It's all rubbish, of course.
The underlying thought running through the ENTJ mind might be something like "I don't care if you call me an insensitive b*****d, as long as I remain an efficient b*****d".
|
ESTJ THE EXECUTIVE
Correct.
|