Perhaps it isn't surprising that 'cheating' continues wholesale despite rigorous testing. In fact, it would be more surprising if it didn't.
Why? Because
- the objective is that nobody should use proscribed substances; but
- the tool for enforcing that is that the athlete has to pass the drug tests
So, the sport internalises this in the usual way and sees the objective as passing the test. It's exactly the same as the police under-recording crimes so as to hit the detection rates, or A&E units leaving patients waiting outside in ambulances so that don't don't exceed the four hour target for getting them through.
In effect, they are set an upper limit for the amount of each substance. If they can stay under that, then they are achieving the target they have been set, so it can be rationalised as 'not cheating'.
Last edited by: Manatee on Wed 5 Aug 15 at 16:52
|