MD and Ted: what could you have missed? Nothing to miss.
You can't get your heads round the idea that there might be a way of reducing every creature's or vehicle's resource consumption to a common standard of acres per year per creature or vehicle?
The slightly annoying Fry also said that according to his sources the world is being used up 40% faster than it should be to maintain stability. Or what's the word... sustainability.
Of course figures of this sort should be treated with scepticism. No one knows it all, or even most of it really. No need to panic yet I can't help feeling despite the mounting clamour from all sides. We can switch to second-class protein almost overnight and many of us would be healthier for it. Ask Perro.
Most of us could eat 25% less and be healthier. The real fatties could eat 50% less and be a lot healthier- that's 40% of the UK population.. Most of them live in Cumbria...
And the milk. Met a guy, in Wales, whose job then was to measure the radioactivity (Caesium isotopes?) of grass in high rainfall areas, from Chernobyl fallout. Apparently taken up in the silicates which grasses use for structural purposes.
Caesium 137: nuclear half-life of 30 years. Chernobyl: 1986. And apparently the antidote to caesium take-up is a little Prussian blue! Just looked up caesium etc in Wiki:)