Non-motoring > Forum S/W question: Why >> and not > ? Miscellaneous
Thread Author: FotheringtonTomas Replies: 3
View Threaded 

 Mon 26 Apr 10 12:28 
 Forum S/W question: Why >> and not > ? - FotheringtonTomas
">>" is two characters. It's more to tripe than ">". ">" is familiar quoting from Usenet, etc.

So, why ">>" and not ">" ?
Reply to this message | Report message
       
 Mon 26 Apr 10 12:30 
 Forum S/W question: Why >> and not > ? - FocalPoint
"More to tripe..."

I like it.
Reply to this message | Report message
       
 Mon 26 Apr 10 12:35 
 Forum S/W question: Why >> and not > ? - Zero
>> ">>" is two characters. It's more to tripe than ">". ">" is familiar quoting from
>> Usenet etc.
>>
>> So why ">>" and not ">" ?
>>

I didnt type it, it came up on its own, so no probem for me.
Reply to this message | Report message
       
 Mon 26 Apr 10 13:16 
 Forum S/W question: Why >> and not > ? - Focusless
>> I didnt type it it came up on its own so no probem for me.

Ie. use the 'Quote Original Message' button, deleting anything you don't want.
Reply to this message | Report message
       
Latest Forum Posts