F1 and general motorsport discussion - Vol 9 - VxFan
***** This thread is now closed, please CLICK HERE to go to Volume 10 *****
As the title suggests, a place to discuss Formula One, and all other types of motorsport (excluding MotoGP, which has a section of its own).
PLEASE NOTE:-
To try and maintain some kind of logical order of discussion, if you start a new subject then reply to this post and remember to change the default subject header.
Last edited by: VxFan on Mon 11 Apr 11 at 01:11
Mon 7 Feb 11 23:24
Robert Kubica has suffered "serious injuries" - henry k
This photo in the Sun shows what caused the damage to the car and to Robert.
Robert Kubica has suffered "serious injuries" - bathtub tom
Very sad. I thought of him as an 'up and coming' driver.
I hope he makes a decent enough recovery to earn a respectable living.
Mon 7 Feb 11 23:42
Robert Kubica has suffered "serious injuries" - rtj70
I too hope he makes a good recovery. If that mighty reliable tome of a paper (Sun) is right he lost 5 pints of blood. The body of the average adult is about 5 litres or just under.
From the photo of the armco barrier - he's just lucky to be alive. That bad accident in F1 he had was nothing compared to hitting some guard rail at speed and at the wrong angle!
What I don't see from the media coverage so far is how he might recover fully and ALSO want to race! He's just survived a bad accident and nearly lost his hand.
Tue 8 Feb 11 17:01
Robert Kubica has suffered "serious injuries" - Zero
>> What I don't see from the media coverage so far is how he might recover
>> fully and ALSO want to race! He's just survived a bad accident and nearly lost
>> his hand.
He will want to race. What separates a skilled driver from a winning F1 driver is the complete lack of any appreciation of risk or consequences, combined with a feeling of invincibility. Zanardi raced again with no legs, and crashed a lot afterwards.
I doubt he will race again tho. You need feel in your hands. I doubt he will have that touch back again.
Tue 8 Feb 11 17:10
Robert Kubica has suffered "serious injuries" - John H
>> I doubt he will race again tho.
I agree with that doubt, certainly unlikey to race in Formula1, but see the story of Alessandro "Sandro" Nannini en.espnf1.com/f1/motorsport/driver/1104.html
"Nannini's Formula One career was cut short when an arm was severed in a helicopter accident. Micro-surgery reattached the limb, and Alessandro became a race-winner in the German Touring series. .... ..... and a contract with Ferrari was rumoured, came the helicopter crash. Fighting back valiantly, he starred for Alfa Romeo on the international touring car scene until 1997, when he joined Mercedes' works sports car team. "
Tue 8 Feb 11 17:15
Robert Kubica has suffered "serious injuries" - Zero
Yeah, legless Zanardi came back for 6 years into World Touring Cars.
Tue 8 Feb 11 17:40
Robert Kubica has suffered "serious injuries" - crocks
And Johnny Herbert came back from a bad crash in F3000, which nearly cost him both feet, to some success in F1.
But I believe he never quite got back all the strength he needed.
Tue 8 Feb 11 16:44
Robert Kubica has suffered "serious injuries" - John H
>> This photo in the Sun shows what caused the damage to the car and to
>> Robert.
Bernie Ecclestone said he would give it till Wednesday to calm down in Bahrain. It's unlikely that the authorities there will lose. Small country, US naval base closest to Iran, can't be allowed to.
Unfortunately for F1 enthusiasts Bahrain society embodies in an inconvenient way the schism within Islam between the Tradition and the Cult. So if, as Zero shrewdly predicted, much blood is going to be shed there it's unlikely that the dust will have truly settled by Wednesday.
Not a peep out of Syria yet although the Libyan dissidents are having a bit of a go. Of course the Syrian mukhabarrat have the hook. If they get seriously miffed with you they impale you from a meat hook through one of your orifices and pull on the bits that hang down.
Oh of course *WE* know that, alas the Middle East nations dont, they are all bouyed up by the brutal repression that followed the sham Iranian elections.
Of course all you are doing is shaking up the fizzy drink bottle by doing that. When the top comes off it flies a long way and is lost - very messy.
Incidentally, the BBC World Service says the Egyptians are celebrating their 'revolution' and there will be a programme about it.
Have I missed something?
Bernie has just been "interviewed" on BBC
The crown prince will decide if the GP goes ahead.
Usual responses from Berie but it appears that Tuesday is decision day.
I thought that a rather strange interview. Bernie might have expressed himself better along lines of taking advice from foreign office and other sources and will make final decision by Tuesday. On the one hand, unless he's gone by then, the CP clearly has a veto. On the other hand, however much the CP wants the event to go ahead it's not likely to happen if there's massive unrest, no guarantee of security at the circuit and adverse steers from the FO.
So quite why the interviewer needed to adopt such a pompous tone I don't know.
Missed the end of the Ecclesone interview as I found Gary Richardson's style too grating. Reports later suggest postponement as an option though not clear how they can shoehorn a later date into the rest of the race season.
He still doesn't say where he will fit it in. You cant say,. oh lets just squeeze it in here, or tack it on at the end. Abu Dhabi is GP no 19, (now 18) and Brazil is no 20 (now 19)
There is only 12 days between Abu Dhabi and Brazil, and half the world apart. You cant ship them back again from Brazil.
Listened to a documentary on the World Service on Friday detailing why F1 needs to explore new territories; it doesn't contain any great revelations and gets a little unnecessarily dewy-eyed over Maranello, but is interesting nonetheless.
(It also contains a nice little line regarding the Tifosi's preference of Villeneuve over Schumacher.)
Part 2 on Friday. Part 1 available on the Documentaries page of the BBC World Service website. Please note that I'm too old and lazy to paste a link; if you are interested you'll find your way to it...
Fwiw, I quite liked the WRC coverage when it was in Dave in the last couple of years. I thought moving it to ESPN may improve things further, but the coverage is much shorter now, and isn't always at a convenient time.
I was quite looking forward to seeing the new Citroen and Ford WRC cars in action, but unless things improve I can't see me watching very often.
"Formula 1 chief Bernie Ecclestone says there is growing support for using sprinkler systems to wet F1 tracks in order to make races more entertaining."
Seems a bit extreme to me.
Tue 22 Mar 11 17:50
Ecclestone stands by Formula 1 'fake rain' plans - Perky Penguin
IMO what is needed to make F1 more entertaining is more overtaking (check out MotoGP - more overtakes per lap than in some whole F1 bore sessions). Wet tracks won't help overtaking.
Tue 22 Mar 11 18:14
Ecclestone stands by Formula 1 'fake rain' plans - Robin O'Reliant
>> IMO what is needed to make F1 more entertaining is more overtaking (check out MotoGP
>> - more overtakes per lap than in some whole F1 bore sessions). Wet tracks won't
>> help overtaking.
>>
So many overtakes and re-overtakes in fact that most of them are meaningless.
1
Tue 22 Mar 11 18:23
Ecclestone stands by Formula 1 'fake rain' plans - Perky Penguin
Maybe meaningless in respect of the final placings but still worth watching - better than a procession with mimimal overtaking.
Tue 22 Mar 11 18:15
Ecclestone stands by Formula 1 'fake rain' plans - Armel Coussine
Wetting the track on purpose is a damn silly idea. If it's raining will they bring out a lot of old jet engines on dollies to dry the track I wonder?
It's another nail in the coffin of motor racing as a genuine outdoor sport and another step towards something more like full-size scalextric or slot racing. Just awful.
Tue 22 Mar 11 18:35
Ecclestone stands by Formula 1 'fake rain' plans - Zero
The whole excitement of rain in F1, is the unpredictability of it. Will it, wont it, where, when, how much, how long, leading to "should I change to wets, intermediates, stay on slicks"
Seems like Bernie is loosing it. Perhaps he is punch drunk after being beaten up by his wife too often.
Tue 22 Mar 11 19:03
Ecclestone stands by Formula 1 'fake rain' plans - Stuu
Seems like these new high wear tyres will create a few interesting situations anyway, Im looking forward to seeing how they turn out for creating excitement.
Tue 22 Mar 11 19:30
Ecclestone stands by Formula 1 'fake rain' plans - zookeeper
its just a bit of pre season bang drumming
Thu 24 Mar 11 14:20
Ecclestone stands by Formula 1 'fake rain' plans - TheManWithNoName
Why doesn't Mr E go the whole hog and introduce pot holes. That'll make it interesting. Maybe F1 will help develop some sort of pothole avoidance device to be rolled-out to the common motorist.
He could go further still and put pelican crossings or traffic lights on a track - Hell why not just allow spectators to wander around or paint a cycle lane on it too!
Personally I like Top Gear's suggestion of a figure of eight track. Hmmm, nice.
That was a suprise. Vettel wasnt although where Webber was I dont know, I expect he is asking the same thing ( as will Button no doubt ), but McLaren being right up there and Ferrari being relatively nowhere just goes to show that test pace doesnt always translate to the first GP.
Highlight was in the post-quali coverage when Ron Dennis gave Jordan a actual piece of 'humble' pie, rightly so I think, what a turnaround, not often our man Ed has to eat his words.
Vettel though, wow, blew Webber away in a very serious manner and Hamilton also, bearing in mind he didnt have Kers and Jenson did, also made a big statement of intent by going nearly a half second quicker - if as they say Kers is worth 3 tenths, that woul bring the team mate difference to 8 tenths like Webber/Vettel - some head scratching to go on for sure.
Koby was up there and HRT looked even more of a joke than last year if thats at all possible ( apparently so - 10 seconds off the pace is quite something ). Schui - oh dear, I hope he has good race strategy ( he may well do if the tyres make the difference ).
Just saw a clip of the 3 quali 'winners' waving to the crowd, taken from behind - Vettel in the middle with his arms round the shoulders of Hamilton and Webber, but it was obvious that there was no way Webber was going to put his arm around Vettel...
Track temperatures at Barcelona were not much higher. Melbourne was cool yes, for Melbourne, but not that much cooler than Barcelona.
This was the first time they were all on similar fuel loads. Don't forget there is no refuelling this year, so they all have to have been on race distance fuel.
8c is not significant, Most tyres are designed to run at between 90 and 110c. As you see 8c falls into that tolerance range.
It was however significant that they were not working the temperatures up, no hot or fast warm up laps. So clearly the 8c lower track temperature was not considered a factor by the teams, or they would have been working the tyres up hotter.,
If it had been a factor then Vettel would not have posted a qualifying time .5 seconds faster than last year despite being significantly heavier on a full race distance fuel load.
And anyway, the track temperature is the same for ALL teams. So its not a factor in comparing teams between Barcelona and Melbourne. No one know what fuel loads they were running in testing, but at Melbourne they do. Clearly that the biggest difference in testing and qualifying.
Edit and all the last minute changes and additions to cars of course.
Yes true indeed. I would say however that Ferrari and Mercedes were both off the pace for some reason. The most likely reason being how their cars use the tyres. From what I gathered everyone in the pitlane said the tyres were far more durable than at any time during the tests. If Ferrari and Mercedes were good on those tyres during testing then maybe the change has caught them out. (Doesnt explain why RedBull were largely unaffected though).
Autosport.com was running an article saying that after careful analysis of the test times that they reckoned Ferrari were the team to beat. 2 have managed so far!
Have you seen Autosport mag, they have a graphic showing the fastest cars I testing, Alonso, Vettle, Massa IIRC, the notable thing is the Webber is missing, strange, must be an error.
The world champion still has the machine. He needs to watch out for the Aussie though. Not to mention our two matinee idols who seem to have found some speed, anyway if you listened to what was being said beforehand. But Lewis Hamilton appeared to be in a towering rage after his more-than-creditable effort in splitting the Red Bulls. Perhaps his girl friend's dress was to blame. It wound me up and I don't even know the lady.
Kobayashi still well up there, faster than his car (like the man in the song who was too sexy for his shirt). In fact during the first session, in which he was third fastest, he did a couple of spectacular high-speed slides on his fast lap. He is one of very few who can contain those in a modern F1 car.
Alonso coping well with a piggish understeering Ferrari. Not their style really.
Takeru Kobayashi (born March 15, 1978) is a Japanese competitive eater. He held the world record for hot dog eating for nearly six years, and holds several other eating records, including three Guinness Records for hot dogs, meatballs, and hamburgers.
They used to drink in the Crabtree by the river in Hammersmith. Their office was right opposite my studio, probably still is. On the day of Concorde's last flight everyone piled into the street for the final flyover which was right above us, and I got talking to their secretary who was a delicious piece of mature action. I remember thinking it would be fun to get her into bed (or on the boardroom table), but I never saw her again after that.
On BBC4 at 9:00 Sunday night, a documentary on the dark days of the sixties and seventies when F1 drivers accepted that it was not if you died, but when, if you raced for long enough.
I am fortunate enough to have obtained an HD* copy of Grand Prix - the 1966 film directed by John Frankenheimer in 70mm super panavision ( I was lucky enough to have seen it as a child when it premièred in London shown in Cinerama format)
Featuring Phil Hill, Graham Hill, Juan-Manuel Fangio, Jim Clark, Jochen Rindt, Jack Brabham, Richie Ginther and Bruce McLaren, and superb in car footage of the banking at Monza, it shows perfectly the do or die (literally) attitude of motor racing of the pre 1070's birth of the safety culture.
There are two great racing Films, the 1966 version of Grand Prix above, and 1971 Le Mans directed by Lee H. Katzin, starring Steve McQueen.
*Yes the old HD format before Blueray won the hi def wars. So I can only play it on the PC.
Just watched the 2 documentaries on BBC 4. Both very good. The second one on the risks and dangers in the 60s and 70s was tragic. The most shocking was the death of Williamson, where everyone except a fellow driver basically did nothing to help the stricken and burning car. All played out live on TV
Off we go again - up at 6, I tried to enjoy the first race of 2011, but it was sooo boring. Vettel drove well and won .. again. Yes, Petrov's second place was a surprise, but hardly earth shattering. Button was frustrated .. yes, again. Maybe more interesting will be the prog on BBC4 tonight, 9-10, on F1's "killer years" of the 60s and 70s.
Who but a lunatic or fanatic or pathological early riser like Pat would get up at dawn, when there's a repeat at lunch time?
In his bad-tempered bleariness, Buddy failed to notice that in fact it was an interesting race, packed with incident and technical interest, and giving pointers to the rest of the season (but only pointers).
Petrov brilliant, Hamilton very solid indeed, Kobayashi feeling his way in, old warhorse Barichello going for a bit of comedy, Paul di Resta keeping his nose clean and making up two places in cool low-key fashion.
How did Lewis Hamilton's car go so fast with its belly dragging along the ground? A single speed bump or decent pothole would have sent him vaulting into New South Wales. And what was wrong with the Sauber rear wing that got both cars disqualified?
Boring indeed! Some people just don't really like motor racing. Perhaps they would prefer banger racing.
Di Resta initially finished 12th in the Australian Grand Prix, only to be elevated to 10th after the race as Sauber duo Sergio Perez and Kamui Kobayashi were excluded from the classification. The FIA have cited a technical infringement relating to the rear wing, however, Sauber have since lodged a statement of intention to appeal.
If i am at home i might watch the start and just the first couple of laps if it's on at a normal time, then possibly flick over to it a couple of times to watch the procession for a few minutes, but i certainly wouldn't stay in, or get out of bed at 6 o'clock to watch it these days as it is so boring now, and i am another person who used to love following F1 !
agree with all of that, Skip - F1 must now be the dreariest example of motor sport ... give me the excitement and driving skills of World Rallying any day; trouble is, it's not on very often.
In the 80s F1 was a lot more interesting as there was not only overtaking but the cars were not as reliable. Sometimes due to overheating they'd fail to get off the grid.
The real threat of mechanical failure is a much needed wildcard, IMHO. And if you're going to have mechanical failure, it should be properly spectacular. As in engine internals becoming externals, not a software glitch on a flappy paddle gearbox...... ;-)