Anti-social drivers in Surrey targeted in crackdown
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-11743024
|
150 drivers nabbed for something out of 174 stopped is an enormously high strike rate.
No wonder the police target motorists.
|
>> 150 drivers nabbed for something out of 174 stopped is an enormously high strike rate.
>>
Nobody said it was a random sample. It is only 35 per hour - if you sit on a fairly main road it would be easy to pick an 'iffy' looking car and driver every 2 minutes.
Actually if it was properly resourced, you could probably pull considerably more. Let us see what resident plod has to say ;)
Last edited by: pmh on Fri 12 Nov 10 at 17:57
|
...if you sit on a fairly main road it would be easy to pick an 'iffy' looking car and driver every 2 minutes...
My only point is there are a lot of offending drivers, 150 out of 174 according to cops, one every two minutes according to you.
|
Ballpark numbers - A25 carries about 20000 cars a day, according to a couple of traffic count surveys online. Other similar roads carry between about 18k and 25k, so that seem about right.
So in the five hour operation they stopped 174 out of roughly 8300 vehicles - 2%, and nearly all of them had a problem.
You can't draw much of a conclusion from that. 98% of cars don't look iffy? A lot more looked iffy but there was insufficient resource to pull them all? They were 100% effective at identifying the iffy looking ones and pulled them all?
|
>> Ballpark numbers - A25 carries about 20000 cars a day, according to a couple of
>> traffic count surveys online. Other similar roads carry between about 18k and 25k, so that
>> seem about right.
>>
>> So in the five hour operation they stopped 174 out of roughly 8300 vehicles -
>> 2%, and nearly all of them had a problem.
Depends on the time of day. If your 5 hours is during the day, your traffic density will be right down, compared to morning and evening rush hour, and school run time
|
I don't think you can draw any conclusions except as to the minimum likely proportion of offenders based on the numbers found and the total throughput, if known.
113/174 were clearly stopped after an offence was seen - speeding, seat belt, mobile phone, over-tinted windows. The remainder, 28/33, were the 'defects' and tax disc offences (which might also have been visible before the stop). Clearly nothing random going on here.
Unless they blocked the road, or had an unlimited number of stoppers, presumably many other offenders went by while they were occupied with the stoppees.
|
about time too but it needs to be country wide everyday.
I am getting fed up with soo many drivers blatently using their mobile phones especially at roundabouts!
|
good
sick of being stopped in my non white van as lawbreakers pass on the phone eating a maccy dee and chucking their rubbish out of their dirty bald tyred untaxed unserviced faulty foreign cars-----------
:-)
|
|
I wondered why my lad was home late tonight.
|
>> Anti-social drivers in Surrey targeted in crackdown
>>
>> www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-11743024
>>
I agree with cracking down on "anti-social" drivers.
|
|
Good for Surrey police. I hope they caught a few tailgaters, too.
|
|
You would have to stop everyone in Surrey then.
|
...You would have to stop everyone in Surrey then...
You could stop the one in front quickly an wait for the rest rear-end each other.
|
the one behind is a Chelsea footballer in a Lincoln navigator.
Not something you want to be "taken from behind" by.
|
...Not something you want to be "taken from behind" by...
Better to be taken from behind by his car than by the guy himself.
|
|
It's playing it down to call them anti-social. They're law breakers.
|