www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6258565/Car-makers-using-suspicious-parts-vehicles-having-safety-checks-official-testers-claim.html
Article suggests components found in cars are marked "For crash test only".
I would have thought it safer to buy a car from a dealer at random and test that. Obviously the cost of that would need to be included in the fee to the manufacturer for the test.
Surely the next step would be to compare some of the marked components fitted to the test car against those fitted to models for sale, including software - e.g. over sensitive ABS or traction control routines.
|
I thought the basis of all valid and meaningful tests was that the items or sevice for testing should be selected randomly after release for general sale or use?
|
they are so marked for version control and for tracking prior and after the test.
|
The Euro NCAP scheme is voluntary anyway - as shown by the Audi issue in 2014, where some dealers were claiming some models had achieved five stars, when they hadn't been tested.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27392157
|