>> “I was surprised to find that they rejected my appeal. I went to POPLA (Parking
>> on Private Land Appeals) but they rejected my appeal too and even wrote, 'by the
>> defendant’s own admission, he stayed in the area.'
When it was first set up the POPLA appeals service was run under contract by the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service (PATAS)* which provides the Tribunal for parking and other infringements in the London Boroughs. It is now provided by The Ombudsman Service, a private company that runs a number of consumer Omduds schemes. Presumably its remit is limited to the facts of the infringement and it cannot, unlike tribunals dealing with council regulations, recommend the use of discretion.
This case should never have got near POPLA. Unless there is doubt about Kevin's story it should have been cancelled by the Hospital. They still have the option now to 'do the right thing' and refund him.
*I have met professionally in past with staff and Adjudicators at PATAS. They were almost certainly far too independent for the members of the British Parking Association for whose places POPLA is run.
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Mon 16 Apr 18 at 13:18
|