What on earth would be the point of discussing the attitude of the cyclist with you?
You will *always* find a justification, you will *always* find something the motorist/police/lorry driver did that was worse and you will *always* find a reason why what the cyclist did was perfectly acceptable.
Of course, that does mean that I *never* listen to anything you have to say on the subject, which might defeat your purpose.Worth thinking about, I should have thought.
Insofar as normal behaviour from a normal human beings might be considered, the cyclist was, and probably is, a total t***.
Far more likely that the defence should run the other way;
Officer: "I know I was wrong, m'lud, but he was a total a***".
Judge: "Fair enough".
Last edited by: No FM2R on Sun 7 Jun 15 at 18:25
|