>> No doubt many will now say the crew should have had a way to stop
>> the vehicle. Maybe they should on future designs. But how often has this happened?
Precisely. It could just as easily have been a delivery lorry, with only the driver on board.
I wouldn't even consider it on a future design. Only the driver should be able to access the controls; otherwise there is too much risk of someone either accidentally or even deliberately (in the case of an argument) hitting the "dead man" and causing an accident. Imagine somebody doing that at 50 mph on a dual carriageway? Carnage would result.
Too easy for the uneducated, for want of a better word, to equate the matter with trains, where such a device is available. Trains however work in an environment which is effectively separated from pedestrians and other steerable vehicles, lorries and cars don't.
I do however predict that this accident, for all the wrong reasons, will bring renewed calls for lorries to be kept out of urban environments.
Last edited by: Harleyman on Tue 23 Dec 14 at 23:08
|