>>I posted them as differing perspectives from different places.
I'm not having a go, or suggesting that you or the writers had the answer. They were all worth reading especially for me as I haven't ploughed through every word on this previously- rather the opposite.
>>.As for a solution, to which problem?
I thought it was clear that I meant the problem/circumstances I enumerated in the first paragraph.
The others you mention are confounding problems in this context. As far as the gatherings are concerned it's trite but probably true that the police are damned whichever approach they adopt.
The arguments about the police handling of the vigil/protest/civil unrest are a massive distraction and I imagine the people who are genuinely concerned about misogyny and the safety of women will think that too. They seem to want the attacks stopped and the need for women to arrange their lives and restrict their own freedom to avoid danger removed - perfectly reasonable, but their anger suggests all that's needed is the will to do it - my question is simply "how, because it isn't obvious to me?"
|