>> >> What a nasty bunch though, all of them actually except Ms Lawson's poor children.
>>
>>
>> On reflection, I don't see her as particularly at fault either really. The Charles Saatchi
>> email was what really dropped her in it. But the real villain of the piece
>> is the defence counsel, unless you include the defendants who were clearly taking the pee
>> at least, by what most people would call large-scale theft.
>>
>> Yup, I'm on team Godzilla if I have to choose a team. I like pretty
>> smiling women with a wicked twinkle in their eye. All she did was trust the
>> staff who weren't trustworthy in any way. One of the many potential problems with having
>> servants is that when push comes to shove they know a lot about you, and
>> can be relied on to exaggerate and make you sound as sleazy and criminal as
>> possible.
>>
I'm another who thought the jury got it wrong, but I suppose if you throw enough mud around to confuse the issue your twelve good men and true will blanch at sending a couple of tarts to Bandyman's land for a ten stretch.
|
